In a June 18th article, Radio Business Report falsely stated that:

[record] "labels have shifted their rhetorical leverage, first seeking royalties from satellite and internet platforms since they are different than radio, and now seeking royalties from radio to level the playing field. RIAA can't have it both ways." http://www.rbr.com/radio/15253.html

THE FACTS: At a March 9, 1995 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "The Performance Rights in Sound Recordings Act of 1995," RIAA CEO Jay Berman said: "We began this process, Mr. Chairman, over 23 years ago when we sought the same right enjoyed by all other copyright owners, a full performance right. Last Congress, this effort was limited to digital transmissions. Today, we are seeking an even more constricted bill that applies only to digital subscription and interactive services. It specifically excludes radio broadcasting.... If this is the price of gaining a minimum level of protection for the future, we are willing to pay it..."

There has been no shift in rhetoric or goal. In 1995, the music industry grudgingly acquiesced to the broadcasters' legislative carve out in the interest of getting a "minimum level of protection" for digital broadcasts of music. The record is clear. And try as they might, Big Radio can't rewrite historical facts to strengthen their case.